Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

Matter bends light. The theory of general relativity predicts that the presence of matter or energy changes the geometry of space and time, which in turn can cause what would otherwise be the straight path of a beam of light to curve. Take a distant source of light. If we assume the universe not to be empty, then between us and said source there exists a non trivial matter disposition. As light travels through everything that is in between us and the source, it gets blocked, bent and distorted. We call this phenomenon weak lensing. In practice what we measure is the shape of distant galaxies. These images do not show a distinct lensing feature individually, as such tiny changes can only be seen with a large number of sources. For example, we observe that galaxies have a tendency of aligning along a preferred axis, causing a statistical discrepancy in an otherwise seemingly isotropic universe. For further details on lensing, please refer to Kilbinger (2015) Bartelmann & Maturi (2017); for weak lensing Blandford et al. (1991). The image of a distant galaxy can change shape or size. Changes in shape are fully characterised by the shear distortion \Vec{\gamma} vector field, where the change in size is given by its magnitude, the convergence field κ\kappa. We lay out a theoretical framework for weak lensing in Sec. ?? as well as details on the cosmology used in this thesis in Sec. ??.

A lot of work goes into translating a measurement of distant galaxies to its mathematically friendly counterpart \Vec{\gamma}. This is one of the reasons why we will not be dealing with it in this thesis, as it is outside of our scope. Instead we will be simulating our own convergence fields. We use a Gaussian random field (GRF) algorithm for the creation of Gaussianly distributed data. As well as lognormal transformations to create fields with a distribution that resembles more closely that in our universe. These transformations are listed in Sec. ??; we then use them to simulate our data as explained in Sec. ??. We also verify that the generated fields recover the fiducial power spectrum in Sec. ??.

Figure 1:Simplified steps taken by the model to go from cosmological parameters Θ\Theta to likelihood L\mathcal{L} using GP. Here CC and ww stand for the power spectrum and correlation function respectively, yy is the data.

A Gaussian process (GP) usually assumes little prior knowledge about the data it is applied to. Current research in the field of cosmology views GPs as a machine learning tool to be trained. It is used to accelerate and optimise models Mootoovaloo et al. (2020) Boruah et al. (2022) Karchev et al. (2022), as well as for its interpolation qualities applied to the reconstruction of functions determining the evolution of the universe Shafieloo et al. (2012) Seikel et al. (2012) Holsclaw et al. (2010). Our work, however, is based on a different approach. We apply our prior knowledge about 2-point statistics in cosmology to create a fully informed GP. Restricting ourselves to 2D flat-sky weak lensing convergence fields, as shown in Fig. 1, we can:

With a Bayesian approach we make use of this pipeline to infer the values of the cosmological parameters. Running a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) we can sample the posterior distribution of the cosmological parameters, in particular we will get contours for Ωm\Omega_m, σ8\sigma_8 and S8S_8. Other than that, GPs have several other interesting properties at the field level. They are not only able to generate fields that recover the fiducial 2-point statistics, but are also able to reconstruct masked fields, a task that usually brings many challenges to CC_\ell estimation Chon et al. (2004) Brown et al. (2005). In the field of weak lensing in particular, foreground objects like bright stars or galaxies can contaminate measurements, leading to the need of masking such a region, essentially removing the signal.

Here we list the advantages of our method:

Whilst some of the disadvantages:

GPs in this thesis are presented in a general introduction in Sec. ??, followed by a detailed account of the computational methods used to recover a working kernel for GPs in Sec. ??. In our results we show their ability to create maps that follow the desired statistic Sec. ?? and reconstruct data Sec. ??. We also present our attempt at cosmological parameters inference with GPs in Sec. ??.

It is important to note that throughout the thesis we follow the extremely useful guidelines set by the Miko pipeline Zhou et al. (2023) on how to deal with discrete maps in weak lensing.

References
  1. Kilbinger, M. (2015). Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 78(8), 086901. 10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901
  2. Bartelmann, M., & Maturi, M. (2017). Weak gravitational lensing. Scholarpedia, 12(1), 32440. 10.4249/scholarpedia.32440
  3. Blandford, R. D., Saust, A. B., Brainerd, T. G., & Villumsen, J. V. (1991). The distortion of distant galaxy images by large scale structure. AIP Conference Proceedings, 222(1), 455–458. 10.1063/1.40414
  4. Mootoovaloo, A., Heavens, A. F., Jaffe, A. H., & Leclercq, F. (2020). Parameter inference for weak lensing using Gaussian Processes and MOPED. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 497(2), 2213–2226. 10.1093/mnras/staa2102
  5. Boruah, S. S., Eifler, T., Miranda, V., & Krishanth, P. M. S. (2022). Accelerating cosmological inference with Gaussian processes and neural networks – an application to LSST Y1 weak lensing and galaxy clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 518(4), 4818–4831. 10.1093/mnras/stac3417
  6. Karchev, K., Coogan, A., & Weniger, C. (2022). Strong-lensing source reconstruction with variationally optimized Gaussian processes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512(1), 661–685. 10.1093/mnras/stac311
  7. Shafieloo, A., Kim, A. G., & Linder, E. V. (2012). Gaussian process cosmography. Phys. Rev. D, 85(12), 123530. 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.123530
  8. Seikel, M., Clarkson, C., & Smith, M. (2012). Reconstruction of dark energy and expansion dynamics using Gaussian processes. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2012(06), 036. 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/036
  9. Holsclaw, T., Alam, U., Sansó, B., Lee, H., Heitmann, K., Habib, S., & Higdon, D. (2010). Nonparametric reconstruction of the dark energy equation of state. Phys. Rev. D, 82(10), 103502. 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.103502
  10. Chon, G., Challinor, A., Prunet, S., Hivon, E., & Szapudi, I. (2004). Fast estimation of polarization power spectra using correlation functions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 350(3), 914–926. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07737.x
  11. Brown, M. L., Castro, P. G., & Taylor, A. N. (2005). Cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization pseudo-C\ell estimators and covariances. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 360(4), 1262–1280. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09111.x
  12. Zhou, A. J., Li, X., Dodelson, S., & Mandelbaum, R. (2023). Accurate field-level weak lensing inference for precision cosmology.